Presentation Peer Reviews Part 2

Julia:
Main Argument:
The main argument is that horoscopes and astrology are falsehoods disproved by science, and have an overall negative impact on society.
Strength:
The piece is very informational and claims seem to be well supported; the design and color pallet are both appealing and well related to the theme overall.
Development:
Break up arguments into different pages or use anchor tags to simplify navigation of site; also make sure format is uniform throughout site.

Meredith:
Main Argument:
Photos can be edited and manipulated to make the subject appear completely different, and possibly more socially acceptable; this manipulation has changed our view of social norms.
Strength:
Photo manipulation is well done and proves the point very well; I thought it was really easy to see the argument even before you explained it.
Development:
Having an explanation of how this argument relates to society as a whole and why it is important will make the presentation much stronger; putting it into context will clarify exactly what the argument is and make it more relatable to viewers.

Olive:
Main Argument:
All of the 48 contiguous states have images associated specifically with them; these may be natural scenes or landmarks that have been built there; it also encourages the audience to travel the United States.
Strength:
The design is interesting and visually appealing; the contrast provides depth and diversity within the image.
Development:
Finish up editing so that all states are aligned.

Kim:
Main Argument:
This site is a place to both advertise and sell "UP Unique Creations," an assortment of products made in the UP.
Strength:
Site is easy to understand, tabs at top are easy to navigate.
Development:
Clarify exactly what is being sold from the start; maybe include something at the top of the page. Also, make it easier to see that there is more to scroll down to.

Caitlyn:
Main Argument: Candidate image in the presidential election is extremely important, almost to the point of being ridiculous; they must pay attention to image as much as they do policy.
Strength: The argument is clear; images are entertaining and appealing to the viewer. Each point seems well defined and expanded on, it is very informational.
Development: Even planning for a larger size, the text still seems a little small.

Courtney:
Main Argument: November is national novel writing month and you should participate by writing a novel.
Strength: Color scheme/contrast is good, very informational, argument is easy to see. Minimalist design supports argument.
Development: On last page, consider switching the "congratulations" and "don't worry" sections so that congratulations is on top.

Devin:
Main Argument: Michigan Tech's meal plans are more expensive than simply buying food and preparing meals off campus would be; also, preparing your own food is a better option overall.
Strength: Very informative, and well supported by student surveys.
Development: Clarify some of the images with text descriptions.

Hannah:
Main Argument: Hannah's sister has interesting opinions and an inviting place for audiences to view them.
Strength: Background and layout is very visually appealing; it is personal and inviting.
Development: More whimsical font for post titles would tie in better with font of post itself; make "Everyday Effervescence" more visible.

Jane:
Main Argument: We, as millenials, have traits, skills, and beliefs unlike any other generation and must find a way to use them to our advantage in finding jobs and success overall.
Strength: The video is relatable and the main argument is clear; the images relate well to the content.
Development: Fix sound/music

Jana:
Main Argument: Halonen Landscaping is the best lawn and garden care firm and you should use them for your own landscaping needs.
Strength: Very clear argument, appealing visuals, very simple design conveys point well
Development: Shadow on "Premier.." makes the text seem a little blurry